Tag Archives: Bishop Richard

The mission of the church in our area – part two

The Word who is Life

 Part two  (read part one here)

Appendix: “The Wider Context”

 

The Statistics

 

The bishop has provided a ‘priest to Mass attendance ratio’ of 1:427. Looking at our current ratios for the Crawley Deanery as a whole, we will see from the breakdown in the tables that follow that this pastoral area does in fact have a priest to Mass attendance ration of 1:431. There are, however, deviations above and below this ratio, that if left unaddressed, will begin to cause difficulty as we move closer to 2030 and the forecasted ratio of 1:737. For instance Horsham currently has a ratio of 1:873, whereas Henfield and West Grinstead have the lowest ratios of about 1:135.

Perhaps before we speak of 2030, there needs to be a consideration as to whether there needs to be a balancing out of the pastoral provision and a serious deanery wide consideration of the Mass provision so that each priest is saying each Mass for a steady and healthy average number of people.

 

The Problem of speaking in Ratios:

 

A ratio of 1 priest to 427(2018) or 737 (2030) are exceedingly good ratios, but it is only helpful to speak in ratios if that priest, having celebrated his 3 Sunday Masses, has been able to celebrate Mass for at least that number. The more Church buildings we have to serve the harder it is for a priest to celebrate 3 Masses for anything like 737 people; this is certainly true in the Crawley Parish which fragments its Mass population over six centres.

 

As the ratio of priests to Mass attendance increases to 1:737, the mathematics suggests that a priest would need to celebrate each Mass for about 250 people. Ideally there would even be centres where the priest celebrates his three Masses for significantly more than 737 people, so that some Mass centres can continue with smaller congregations or because that priest has other chaplaincy or diocesan obligations.

 

From the statistics for the 2017 Parish Returns in the Diocesan Ordo:

 

The Crawley Deanery as it stands has the following Sunday Masses:

 

Parish Churches Priests Masses Vigils Day Eve Attendance Ave per Mass
Crawley 6 3 8 2 4 2 1716 214
Horsham 1 1 3 1 2 0 873 291
E Grin 2 1 3 1 2 0 389 130
W Grin 1 1 2 1 1 0 144 72
Henfield 1 1 1 0 1 0 127 127
Horley 1 1 3 1 2 0 288 96
Worth 2 1 3 1 2 0 342 114
Totals 14 9 23 7 14 2 3,879 168

 

 

Other Language Masses:

 

Parish Polish Italian Portuguese Other Total
Crawley 1 0 1 0.5 2.5
Horsham 1 1 0 0 2
E Grin 0 0 0 0 0
W Grin 0 0 0 0 0
Henfield 0 0 0 0 0
Horley 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0
Totals 2 1 1 0 4.5

 

The Crawley Deanery has the following weekday Masses:

 

Parish Churches Priests Masses Day Eve Sat AM Weekly Chaplaincy / School / Convent
Crawley 6 3 8 5 1 0 2
Horsham 1 1 5 4 0 1 0
E Grin 2 1 6 5 0 1 0
W Grin 1 1 3 3 0 1 0
Henfield 1 1 5 5 0 1 0
Horley 1 1 5 5 0 0 0
Worth 2 1 11 5 5 1 0
Totals 14 9 43 32 6 4 2

 

What is the purpose of the weekday Mass?

  • The devotion of the priest and the devotion of the faithful?
  • For the retired?
  • To give working people an extra chance to attend Mass?
  • To facilitate Requiem Masses for the faithful?

 

 

Missing Questions from the Consultation?

The bishop said to us that, along with his five questions, we might identify other questions that are essential to the Mission to which the Lord has called us. Here are some areas of the Mission that should also be considered:

 

  • Diocesan Vocations Strategy
  • We have 42 Deacons in this diocese; in what ways do they play an important role in the life of the diocese?
  • Many parishes still have parish sisters; in what ways do they play an important role in the life of the diocese?
  • Other Chaplaincies: All the talk on the ratio of priests to Mass attendance forgets the other special areas that priests are currently asked to engage with:
    • Hospital Ministry
    • School Ministry / Governorship
    • Gatwick Airport
    • Gatwick Detention Centre (effectively our Deanery Prison)
  • Places of Special Concern: what provision can be made for the following places of special concern within our Deanery:
    • Broadfield (Ecumenical Partnership and Low Income Area)
    • West Grinstead (Shrine Church)

 

NB: the further a priest has to travel it reduces both the number of Masses he can celebrate as the travel time must be included in the ‘transaction time’ for how long it takes to celebrate a Mass; and it reduces his availability for other missionary activity.

 

If we were starting the Diocese with 25 priests where would we put them?

 

If we were starting the Diocese with 25 priests where would we put them?

The starting point, if we have been talking in ratios, suggests that the majority of the priests would be situated in the urban centres. It may be that we need to first reduce and restructure our deaneries – perhaps from the current 13 to 4 (Surrey, West Sussex, East Sussex, Brighton & Hove). This seems to suggest that we would see a breakdown of the 25 priests as something akin to:

  • Surrey – 9 priests
  • West Sussex – 8 priests
  • East Sussex – 4 priests
  • Brighton & Hove – 4 priests

 

Current Deaneries might then become the new parishes. We understand that in 2030 there will be still be 25 priests over 65, but we must acknowledge that by 2040 they will also be retired. These Retired Priests still offer valued ministry, but in fairness to them we cannot take them for granted and as such we do not plan our operational resource on retired priests, but hope that they are able to offer supply. If we are resourcing the diocese with 25 priests then the Crawley Deanery may only have 2 priests by 2040.

 

Where would Masses be celebrated in 2030?

 

American Model – the Mega Church

The Crawley Deanery potentially has a mega Church at Worth Abbey (although it is currently non-diocesan – which would have many administrative and financial issues to unpick). If Worth could be utilized to its full potential it would greatly take the strain off other communities and allow Masses to be celebrated in smaller more rural centres where transport links are less reliable. This assumes that people would travel to Worth, but if there are too many local Churches nearby the incentive to use the mega Church might be reduced.

 

The “Urban Model” – use the Principal Church of the Town

The largest centres of population would seem to be Crawley, Horsham and East Grinstead, but even in these centres of population the seating capacity is not extensive. What could be done to extend, re-build, re-model these Churches which would be realistic in terms of Parish and Diocesan finances? This model would most likely see the end of small satellite Churches of these urban parishes.

 

 

 

 

The “French Model” – the rotating Mass location

In this model, there would always be a Mass in the Urban Centre, and then Mass(es) moves around the existing satellite communities. The People would need to check the newsletter, bulletin board, website to see where the Mass is each week.

 

Some closures are inevitable

The Diocesan 201t returns in the new directory says that there are 126 Churches, 12 Chapels and 1 non-Catholic Church. If there were 25 priests celebrating 3 Masses (in 3 different venues) each week, then the maximum number of Churches that could be sustained is potentially 75 if Mass is to be celebrated in the same churches each week (though the “French Model” would allow otherwise).

 

Towards 2030:

The danger of speaking of 2030 is that this might reduce the sense of urgency. There will need to be a step change towards 2030.

 

What immediate changes should be made in 2018 / 2019?

  • Are there any Churches not viable today?
  • Are there any Masses not viable today?

What are the intermediate changes (towards 2025) that should be made?

  • The closure of any remaining non-viable satellites and chapels of ease
  • Which Churches need to be re-modelled / extended to increase capacity
  • What further changes are needed to make sure that 2030 plans are ready by 2028?